OUR NETWORK:CompTIA TechLore DijitCommunity PogoPlugged MyOpenRouter About UsAdvertiseContact Us
The Largest Online Community
for Software CEOs and Executives.

 
Learn about scoring Forum's Raw Score: 83846.7
January 31, 2012 06:12 AM

Categories: Sales and Distribution

Rating (0 votes)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rate This!

Member Avatar

Claus

Member
Joined: 07/09/2004

Does anyone know what is a typical/standard/normal percentage of the overall budget allocated to sales & marketing in software companies?

In our company it is around 20% which I believe is quite low. The development department is over 50% which seems high in comparison.

Best regards,

Claus

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-5 of 5 | Latest Comment

February 1, 2012 7:22 PM

The answer to this is really highly dependent upon the type of business, but even more so the developmental stage of your business. 50% is very, very high except in the earliest startup stage. In startup you have to develop the product before you have revenues, so the development numbers can be quite skewed early on. 20% is probably low if you really are considering all sales and marketing expenses, including salaries.

Phil Morettini
PJM Consulting
Moretti on Management Blog
http://twitter.com/TechnologyGuy
+1 858 792 1062

February 5, 2012 10:15 PM updated: February 5, 2012 10:48 PM

Phil's exactly right; this is a "gas mileage" question for which there is no standard, "correct" answer. At the same time, if you're counting all of Sales *and* Marketing, I don't think 50% is necessarily extreme. A little high, but not crazy high. At the software companies where I worked, marketing was usually around 30%, and sales expense was around 20%. But, admittedly, those were all relatively young companies that were trying to get traction. Of course, the second part of this issue is what you measure. E.g., at most small companies, the CEO spends half his/her time on sales and marketing. Are you going to throw half his salary into the expense bucket? (Most don't; they put the CEO into something like Operations or Administration, so his/her costs are never fairly apportioned.)

February 5, 2012 10:24 PM

Bruce, when I was talking about 50% being very high I was referring to his number on the development department, not sales & marketing....

Phil Morettini
PJM Consulting
Moretti on Management Blog
http://twitter.com/TechnologyGuy
+1 858 792 1062

February 5, 2012 10:37 PM updated: February 5, 2012 10:47 PM

DOH!!
Sorry, Phil -- you're right, I'm wrong. Didn't read carefully. Apologies.

And yes I agree with you, if the R&D department accounts for 50% of expenses, something is seriously out of whack -- or we're talking about one guy in his parents' basement. :-)

More seriously: This is a very, very, VERY typical problem of software companies built by engineers: All the money goes to building the product, none goes to selling it. And it's a dead-end.

Claus, it sounds to me like the percentages at your company are exactly the reverse of what they should be.

February 8, 2012 5:16 PM

In my experience there are two kinds of products. One that is sales oriented (big ticket items) that require a white shirt and red tie kind of person to close the deal. Then, there's the marketing oriented product. One where you can close the deal over the phone with astute sale professionals.

I am going to try to compare the two expense ratios below.

Sales Oriented Product:
Admin = 11%
R&D = 20%
Tech Support = 15%
Sales = 40%
Marketing = 15%


Marketing oriented product:
Admin = 11%
R&D = 20%
Tech Support = 15%
Sales = 15%
Marketing = 40%

Ok, so my point here is that the nature of the product profile should drive our expense Ratios. Note that the expense ratios for sale and marketing are reversed. For a marketing oriented product you spend more on marketing. For a sales oriented product you spend more on sales. Simple enough.

I once joined a company where the old product line was geared toward mainframe computers. So, the sales process relied on white shirts and red ties chasing every mainframe computer in the country .... merely thousands of them.

My mission was to introduce a PC based product. The president of the company had his successful sales oriented model and tried to duplicate the Sales Oriented model for the PC market place. In effect he had hired the expensive white shirts and red ties to chase down millions of PCs. Yikes!

Nope, that's marketing's job. Get the phone to ring and then my sales guys can close the deal. In effect, the president had set up a situation where we were spending both the 40% on the Sales Expense AND another 40% on marketing to get the phone to ring.

A little math can tell you that that is no fun.

It was no fun re-organizing that sales team to correct his mistake. Too bad he didn't hire me earlier.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Back to Top | Comments 1-5 of 5 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window