OUR NETWORK:CompTIA TechLore DijitCommunity TiVoCommunity MyOpenRouter About UsAdvertiseContact Us
The Largest Online Community
for Software CEOs and Executives.

 
Learn about scoring Forum's Raw Score: 4289.44
January 29, 2005 07:32 PM

Categories: Services and Support

Rating (0 votes)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rate This!

Member Avatar

Stirling

Member
Joined: 02/17/2004

We are responding to a major RFP from a large UK public limited company for a major software product. They want a warranty period of 24 months. We are used to 3 months. 24 months is a long time to wait for support & maintenance to kick in, so means extra provision needs to be priced into purchase or licence fees.

What are others experience of warranty periods required in the UK?

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-4 of 4 | Latest Comment

January 29, 2005 8:04 PM

Stirling, is this is a more-or-less off-the shelf product, possibly with some incidental customization, installation, and/or training; or is it custom software or a product with a LOT of very customer-specific customization?

January 30, 2005 2:16 PM

Its enterprise level software core to utility business including central database, interfaces to other systems, wireless components (ie plenty to go wrong). Hence each client usually needs some changes built to suit the way they operate before we implement - so maybe 25% is almost bespoke and 75% core standard. In our experience requests for change continue as competitve presures call for different business rules, new operational reports, etc.

January 31, 2005 11:06 AM

I've worked with many companies of all different sizes and serving many different markets...both domestically and abroad. I have never seen a request for 24 months of "warranty". However, maybe it is the definition of "warranty" that is part of the disconnect. Can you spell out their definition?

I agree with your initial comment that it needs to be built into the price. Nobody in their right mind would expect any definition of warranty for 24 months without paying for it. So, what's wrong with building 24 months of maintenance fees into the intial purchase price? It seems to me that becomes a great negotiating point. You can reduce the price if they are willing to back down on the warranty period. And, if you clearly define what is included and what isn't, what's wrong with locking them into 24 months of maintenance? I think it goes back to the definition.

January 31, 2005 2:02 PM

Its pretty clear they want 24 months (though I suspect their legal dept have copied a clause they use for buying machinery). The problem in a competitve tender is you dont know what others will do - and it all has to be costed in up front when you are unsure of capability of their staff, etc is - and 24 mths is a long time into future. I have made a couple of private queries in the UK and it is a new concept to them too. Is 3 mths typical in other countries? We will certainly be negotiating but I wanted to know what was standard as a good launching point.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-4 of 4 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window