to get the time to be able to develop value in you responses for big deals like Public private projects take a look at www.globalkap.com for the complex tender collaboration solution and electronic delivery to win
Establishing Value on Big Deals
I was sitting in a staff meeting and the President and Sales VPs were discussing negotiating, discounting and holding the line on price.
One manager said, If we can prove technical superiority, then I can discount less. But if I cant prove product superiority you cant expect me to hold the line on price!
A deal at Major Media Co. came up, and they commented on the fact that it closed with little discounting at $1.2M.
No-one seemed to know why. They were particularly confused because it was closed by a fairly junior rep.
I ran into the rep who closed the Major Media Co. deal and congratulated him. I asked him about the deal. He said, It came in at a great price, but I was concerned it wouldnt close because I there wasnt really a technical or business problem. We replaced an IBM solution that worked. The business wasnt really impacted by the change. It was just that Major Media Co. had three new executives who came on board who wanted to make their mark and they decided to move away from IBM to demonstrate visible positive impact.
The manager who was focused on demonstrating product superiority is apparently not aware that superior political alignment trumps product. Hes having speed and feed conversations with IT people and hell always have long sales cycles and will need to discount frequently. Hes also training his people to do the same.
Hes not focused on the primary factor that determines value in the big deals.
Even the rep who closed the deal thought the absence of technical trouble meant there was no value.
Like people prior to Copernicuss insight, they think product is the center of the universe. Both of them operate with a fundamental misconception. If we separate the signal from the noise, the signal is what powerful people personally want.
What you think justifies the deal is irrelevant.
What justifies the deal is what is personally, emotionally important to the buyer; especially the executives.
The winning factor is almost never PRODUCT SUPERIORITY
RSS


